New Arctic Monkeys Album ‘Favourite Worst Nightmare’ Cover Artwork Review 2007

News, CD Design Artwork Reviews Add comments

What’s that going over the hill - is it a monster? No it’s not the Automatic, it’s the new album cover the Arctic Monkeys 2nd Album Favourite Worst Nightmare. I’ve been waiting to review the new Arctics CD Cover for a while now, so when I finally saw the Sleeve (below), I was to say the least, surprised…

New Arctic Monkeys Album Cover Art Design for avourite Worst Nightmare

The new cover is set in a style worlds-apart from the cover of the Arctic monkeys debut album Whatever People Say I Am, That’s What I’m Not. THAT album cover stirred up plenty of controversy for depicting a man smoking a cigarette, so as a result, heath organizations condemned the album cover. Fortunately these days, controversy equals popularity, so it only helped propel Alex Turner and the lads into superstardom.

Because of the success of the first album (and the cover), I initially found it difficult to like the new album cover for ‘Favorite Worst Nightmare’. The entire ‘vibe’, in my opinion, is all wrong. Yeah, the imagery is fitting with the album tile “Favorite Worst Nightmare” - but the overall album cover art is NOT fitting with the Arctic Monkeys music and sound. The new album sleeve DOES display a sense of continuity with the first album by the use of [near] black & white photography, but this cover doesn’t convey a post-punk revival music style - rather it reminds me of the track “Thriller” by michael Jackson! In addition to this, the graphical-composition has gone awry, because the logo and title ‘touch’ the roof arial on the houses. I feel that the arial should have been removed (by photoshop) from the image to leave total grey sky around the green logo.

However, despite these oversights, the Arctic monkeys new cover ‘works’. Why? Because the Arctic Monkeys are now an ‘established band’, meaning their music is known World-wide. This means a larger percentage of their music sales is a direct result of their music, not the album art, to be blunt. But do consumers buy a CD because of its album art? Yeah, that’s right - CD Covers can have a huge impact on sales. For instance, I’m not really a David Bowie fan, but when the album ‘Hours‘ was released in 1999 I bought it solely because it had a fantastic hologram on the Sleeve! So even though the Arctics CD cover design won’t harm sales, its not going to be selling to people interested in terrace housing!

So, what about this new Arctic Monkeys logo? The graphic-style of the new logo identity reminds me of the now-famous Movie Poster for ‘The Man With The Golden Arm’ (image 1) by legendary Designer, Saul Bass (the man who designed the AT&T logo). This poster, designed back in 1955, depicts a drug-addicts art in a sort of ‘paper cut-out’ style in theme with the rest of the poster. I think there is striking similarities between the graphic-style of this poster and the ‘cut-out’ looking letters that make up the name ‘Arctic monkeys’. It just goes to show that great design can have influences far into the future.

I have a split opinion on the new logo design though. I loved the previous logo design - it oozed with British indie spark, but the new one (and especially in conjunction with the word ‘Brianstorm‘ on the first single cover art) just procures thoughts of the ancient movie ‘Tron’. However, this logo IS different, sets the Arctics artwork apart from a jungle of conventional artwork that streams onto the store shelves. Image 2 shows the new identity on its own, for sake of clarity.Comparison of Arctic Monkeys Album Cover Art and James Bond Poster

Conclusion

Basically, I think a great opportunity has been wasted here. Yeah, the CD will sell…but not by a significant contributory force led by a great CD cover design. The design is visually attractive in its own right, but I feel it conveys all the wrong messages to the wrong audience. Adversely, on one last positive note, the new logo is eye-catching, so when this Arctics Album hits the stores the new (and green) logo will make it instantly recognizable. I’m an Arctic Monkeys fan like many, but this post is solely about the Album cover art - not the music, so I’m giving this album cover artwork only 2 Stars out of five. I know that they’ll be plenty of people out there that like this artwork, but this post is my own opinion. If you agree/disagree with this blog or have any questions or comments for me on this review, please feel free to leave them below.

Review by Andrew Kelsall, Sqwink CD Design
[There are more CD Cover Art reviews in the “CD Design Artwork Reviews” Section, to the right.]

6 Responses to “New Arctic Monkeys Album ‘Favourite Worst Nightmare’ Cover Artwork Review 2007”

  1. coleypops Says:

    i think it’s funky. it’s eye catching. it’s interesting, because there’s this estate - and then on the inside we’ve got all of these swirly pscyheledic colours. i think it says a lot about their new sound, and what they represent. I could go into more detail - but I’m far too tired. nice review though, very well written - and you obviously know your stuff and have thought about your arguments a great deal.

  2. Sqwink Says:

    I see your point about the swirly colours representing the Arctic Monkeys sound. I’ve only heard one track from this album so far, and If I heard the entire thing. I may have a different opinion and totally agree with yours. As is, I reviewed the Album Cover from an ‘impact on the store shelves’ standpoint. Thanks for your constructive comment, hope to hear from you again…

  3. adey Says:

    you say it says a lot about their new sound? whats that supposed to mean when youve only heard one track at the most from it? it probably says more about their background than their “new sound” doesnt sound too new to me sounds like classic arctic monkeys.

  4. Sqwink Says:

    Adey, you have misread my review. I have never insinuated that the Arctic Monkeys have a “new sound”. What I wrote was “…but the overall album cover art is NOT fitting with the Arctic Monkeys music and sound.” I know that their music style has progressed, but still the same sound. Furthermore, when I review album artwork, it is exactly that…a review of the artwork rather than the music. Obviously the album cover can be either an interpretation or observation on the music it represents, so in this case I felt listening to one track from the album was enough to write a review on the album sleeve given that I have heard their previous music.

  5. sam Says:

    does anyone know who the designer/ artist was who produced this artwork???

    would be a great help,
    Thanks.

  6. Andrew Kelsall Says:

    Hi Sam, I do believe it was the Liverpool designers, Juno, who designed the first Arctic Album. Web @ http://www.junostudio.co.uk/

Leave a Reply

New Arctic Monkeys Album ‘Favourite Worst Nightmare’ Cover Artwork Review 2007

News, CD Design Artwork Reviews Add comments

What’s that going over the hill - is it a monster? No it’s not the Automatic, it’s the new album cover the Arctic Monkeys 2nd Album Favourite Worst Nightmare. I’ve been waiting to review the new Arctics CD Cover for a while now, so when I finally saw the Sleeve (below), I was to say the least, surprised…

New Arctic Monkeys Album Cover Art Design for avourite Worst Nightmare

The new cover is set in a style worlds-apart from the cover of the Arctic monkeys debut album Whatever People Say I Am, That’s What I’m Not. THAT album cover stirred up plenty of controversy for depicting a man smoking a cigarette, so as a result, heath organizations condemned the album cover. Fortunately these days, controversy equals popularity, so it only helped propel Alex Turner and the lads into superstardom.

Because of the success of the first album (and the cover), I initially found it difficult to like the new album cover for ‘Favorite Worst Nightmare’. The entire ‘vibe’, in my opinion, is all wrong. Yeah, the imagery is fitting with the album tile “Favorite Worst Nightmare” - but the overall album cover art is NOT fitting with the Arctic Monkeys music and sound. The new album sleeve DOES display a sense of continuity with the first album by the use of [near] black & white photography, but this cover doesn’t convey a post-punk revival music style - rather it reminds me of the track “Thriller” by michael Jackson! In addition to this, the graphical-composition has gone awry, because the logo and title ‘touch’ the roof arial on the houses. I feel that the arial should have been removed (by photoshop) from the image to leave total grey sky around the green logo.

However, despite these oversights, the Arctic monkeys new cover ‘works’. Why? Because the Arctic Monkeys are now an ‘established band’, meaning their music is known World-wide. This means a larger percentage of their music sales is a direct result of their music, not the album art, to be blunt. But do consumers buy a CD because of its album art? Yeah, that’s right - CD Covers can have a huge impact on sales. For instance, I’m not really a David Bowie fan, but when the album ‘Hours‘ was released in 1999 I bought it solely because it had a fantastic hologram on the Sleeve! So even though the Arctics CD cover design won’t harm sales, its not going to be selling to people interested in terrace housing!

So, what about this new Arctic Monkeys logo? The graphic-style of the new logo identity reminds me of the now-famous Movie Poster for ‘The Man With The Golden Arm’ (image 1) by legendary Designer, Saul Bass (the man who designed the AT&T logo). This poster, designed back in 1955, depicts a drug-addicts art in a sort of ‘paper cut-out’ style in theme with the rest of the poster. I think there is striking similarities between the graphic-style of this poster and the ‘cut-out’ looking letters that make up the name ‘Arctic monkeys’. It just goes to show that great design can have influences far into the future.

I have a split opinion on the new logo design though. I loved the previous logo design - it oozed with British indie spark, but the new one (and especially in conjunction with the word ‘Brianstorm‘ on the first single cover art) just procures thoughts of the ancient movie ‘Tron’. However, this logo IS different, sets the Arctics artwork apart from a jungle of conventional artwork that streams onto the store shelves. Image 2 shows the new identity on its own, for sake of clarity.Comparison of Arctic Monkeys Album Cover Art and James Bond Poster

Conclusion

Basically, I think a great opportunity has been wasted here. Yeah, the CD will sell…but not by a significant contributory force led by a great CD cover design. The design is visually attractive in its own right, but I feel it conveys all the wrong messages to the wrong audience. Adversely, on one last positive note, the new logo is eye-catching, so when this Arctics Album hits the stores the new (and green) logo will make it instantly recognizable. I’m an Arctic Monkeys fan like many, but this post is solely about the Album cover art - not the music, so I’m giving this album cover artwork only 2 Stars out of five. I know that they’ll be plenty of people out there that like this artwork, but this post is my own opinion. If you agree/disagree with this blog or have any questions or comments for me on this review, please feel free to leave them below.

Review by Andrew Kelsall, Sqwink CD Design
[There are more CD Cover Art reviews in the “CD Design Artwork Reviews” Section, to the right.]

6 Responses to “New Arctic Monkeys Album ‘Favourite Worst Nightmare’ Cover Artwork Review 2007”

  1. coleypops Says:

    i think it’s funky. it’s eye catching. it’s interesting, because there’s this estate - and then on the inside we’ve got all of these swirly pscyheledic colours. i think it says a lot about their new sound, and what they represent. I could go into more detail - but I’m far too tired. nice review though, very well written - and you obviously know your stuff and have thought about your arguments a great deal.

  2. Sqwink Says:

    I see your point about the swirly colours representing the Arctic Monkeys sound. I’ve only heard one track from this album so far, and If I heard the entire thing. I may have a different opinion and totally agree with yours. As is, I reviewed the Album Cover from an ‘impact on the store shelves’ standpoint. Thanks for your constructive comment, hope to hear from you again…

  3. adey Says:

    you say it says a lot about their new sound? whats that supposed to mean when youve only heard one track at the most from it? it probably says more about their background than their “new sound” doesnt sound too new to me sounds like classic arctic monkeys.

  4. Sqwink Says:

    Adey, you have misread my review. I have never insinuated that the Arctic Monkeys have a “new sound”. What I wrote was “…but the overall album cover art is NOT fitting with the Arctic Monkeys music and sound.” I know that their music style has progressed, but still the same sound. Furthermore, when I review album artwork, it is exactly that…a review of the artwork rather than the music. Obviously the album cover can be either an interpretation or observation on the music it represents, so in this case I felt listening to one track from the album was enough to write a review on the album sleeve given that I have heard their previous music.

  5. sam Says:

    does anyone know who the designer/ artist was who produced this artwork???

    would be a great help,
    Thanks.

  6. Andrew Kelsall Says:

    Hi Sam, I do believe it was the Liverpool designers, Juno, who designed the first Arctic Album. Web @ http://www.junostudio.co.uk/

Leave a Reply

Original WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio - Heavily Modified for this Blog by Andrew Kelsall, Sqwink Design.